Marion Kryczka and the Art of the Living
Thing
The famed 19th and 20th
century American painter Robert Henri stated in his book The Art
Spirit that, “still life in great art is a living thing.”
Marion Kryczka is certainly an exemplar of this ideal in painting.
He is also, perhaps, singular as a Chicago painter, because his
earnest usage of still life defines even his figure-based work.
Kryczka has taught in the Painting and
Drawing Department at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago for
nearly 25 years and has shown his work extensively throughout the
Midwest in that time. Being one of the few traditionalist painters
at the School, Kryczka is a sought out teacher. His reputation as an
instructor is legendary, and his effectiveness is shown in the many
young painters he has encouraged.
Kryczka is widely known for his particular
brand of deftly constructed still life paintings that take cues from
Chardin and share a sense of touch and visual logic with
contemporary painters like Scott Noel and Paul Rahilly. From the
stuff of his world – freshly caught fish, old photographs, and
various small containers, among other items – Kryczka constructs
tense tableaus that refer to a number of themes, from the
persistence of time and the transience of life to the tension
between mankind and nature. The works, with their layering of codes
and meanings, very often take on the seriousness of a votive; in the
shift between real objects and painted objects the items take on
added importance. Always reinforced is the tactile presence
of the surfaces Kryczka paints: iridescent fish scales, glass jars,
glazed tiles, aging skulls, and supple flesh.
This work, so full of what some art world
pundits might describe as banal or boorish (and passé all the
while), is to this reviewer’s eye strikingly more present
in its sense of life than what many of our contemporary artists have
to offer. That is to say that Kryczka’s invocation of these
objects and scenes, which function as the methodology of his
contemplation of himself and the world, contain within themselves
the residual impact of that intensity of thought. He has gazed here,
seen light there, made color and compositional choices, and
translated them into paint as the physical manifestation of his
investigations. That honesty is the resounding value in these works;
it makes us want to delve deeper. There is no pretense here, no
necessity for histrionic embellishment; here is life, here is
thought, here is an existence, all laid out on canvas with oil
paint. The glorious tradition and its 500-year-old technology still
retain the power to transform the everyday, individual concerns into
timeless and universal considerations.
Apart from any attempt to decipher the artist’s intention,
there is the undeniable strength in his grasp of the formal issues
and application of his medium. The way he creates a volume, the way
he captures a certain cast of observed light, the density of the
painted surface, and the saturation of color he is able to
achieve each add to the overall quality of the work. It is these
subtleties of the art of painting that make Kryczka’s paintings
exciting, encouraging, and memorable works at which to look.
Each of the qualities enumerated above apply just as deeply
to Kryczka figurative work, because his observational intensity is
just as keenly aimed at the living and breathing as it is at the
inanimate and stationary. This is part of the integrity of these
works – that they reveal the unsentimental nature of the artist’s
eye. This is not to say that this painter is cold, rather it is to
claim that his own pressure to reveal the inner states that inspire
his painting is far greater than any outward limitations or
conditions. There is no formulaic mode to which the artist must
subscribe, no outside critique, only the voice of experience and the
deep need to create.
What the work of Marion Kryczka offers
viewers is a tangible, felt experience and a sure reward for
scrutiny. The evocative subjects that inhabit his works flex and
breathe with the serendipity of their arrangement and the vigor of
painterly touch; they become “living things” under his watchful
eye and skillful hand. He brings new meaning to the term “plastic
art” as his impeccable painting practice delivers beautiful
paintings full of illusion and observational idiosyncrasies that
never fail to exist as just what they are: paintings.
Matthew Ballou, June 2005